2011年12月30日 星期五

《胡桃夾子》 香港芭蕾舞團






當我一踏入文化中心,便已深深感受到濃厚的聖誕氣氛。小孩子天真爛漫地玩耍,有些則充 滿期待及幻想般似的凝視著佈版上的嘉麗,看得出神。整個大堂頓時變成一個盛大的宴會廳, 有小酒會,也有小茶點,不少父母都帶著他們的兒女,談的笑的,甚是溫馨。形單隻影的 我,當場感到格外孤寂,穿過群群的小家庭時那唏噓感更貫刺我心。但仔看細聽下,不難發 現到處都是英國人。回想起來,這也不出為奇,畢竟看芭蕾舞劇過聖誕是他們的傳統。還記 得那些年,當我還在英國時,每逢聖誕,都一定會重播甚麼胡桃夾子、睡美人的。也許是身 在異鄉,人人總想憑藉那一些微絲的家鄉特產重溫那份溫暖吧。


對於香港芭蕾舞團的印象,一向都是循規蹈矩,善演傳統舞劇。雖然,我亦曾看過他們的現 代芭蕾舞劇,如年頭的《破格芭蕾》,單從文字看,我的確有過前設,有過幻想的。可惜,那些都只是美麗的糖衣,根本就是一場毫無半點新意的傳統劇目。那名字,未免言過於實。 假如那一套劇,對他們而言是屬現代芭蕾舞的話,我亦只能夠說他們還在實驗階段,而且是「與觀眾一起做實驗」的那種。不過,對於這場表演,我還得努力摒除原有的觀念,放鬆欣 賞。對我而言,觀賞古典舞與現代舞之別在於欣賞與閱讀的不同比重。前者以舞蹈去尋找美 的可能性,而後者則以肢體作溝通的渠道。看《胡桃夾子》時,我確實較著重它的美感及技 巧,同時,我也不能忽視同場合演的香港小交響樂團。


在這之前,我亦前後看過三個不同舞團演繹的胡桃夾子,兩個為古典派,一個為當代派。雖 然風格不同,但第一幕還是沒多大的差別,這場也是,可能是因為受到原來劇本的限制吧。 當晚,演出小嘉麗的李茗,舉手投足間都充滿小女孩的天真爛漫,相比我之前觀看過美國大 團的舞者,更有神韻。特別她淘氣的樣子,即使我無法看清她的面部表情,但單從她的姿態, 也很惹人憐愛。這絕對是驚喜。相反,飾演費殊的沈傑則表演稍遜,他的角色只是個小男孩, 他卻像一個不服氣的第三者,稚氣欠奉。對於戲劇成份較重的芭蕾舞劇,清晰的角色定位是 必須的,不然,年幼的觀眾會感到混淆。
雖說第一幕是大同小異,但不同的編舞家亦有他們各自的風格。謝傑斐(Stephen Jefferies) 先生,似乎對男舞蹈員的要求特別高,不論是空騰,或是舉起女舞者,每一步都在追求技巧 上的突破。還記得將近中場休息的那一幕,那完全是力的表現,看著他們不停拋接女伴,真 是一步一驚心,少點默契都不行。同時高難度亦意味著高風險,在整晚的表演,委實有不少 失手點,而大部分都來自男舞者。我還記得當第一個「蝦綠」場面出現時,我也沒暇去弄清 是誰,我身旁的觀眾亦不禁當場驚嘆了一聲:「吓?!」可想而知,那是多麼的突兀。


第二幕是由天使之音-豎琴開場的,簡直是視覺和聽覺的享受。這一幕,是最叫人期待、最為人熟悉的,因為不同的編舞家會對相同的舞曲有著不同的演繹,也隨著班底的不同而變化。 可以是獨舞,也可能是群舞,可以是中國風,也可以是日本風,反正就是最變化多端的幕。 最印象深刻的應該是那段中國舞,雖然也帶著芭蕾舞的影子,但已經是我看過的最正宗了, 這應歸功於編舞盛培琪。我看得出人人都享受其中,一個又一個高難度的Show off,觀眾 似乎挺受落,也很滿足,而我亦樂在其中。畢竟,我也闊別芭蕾舞數年,看到那一幕亦不期 然的有了立即跑上台與他們共舞的衝動。
作為聖誕劇,沒有什麼比氣氛來得重要。綻放的彩條和繽紛的氣球,完美地為這段幻想舞會劃上句號並贏得在場小孩子的歡心。完場時,人人都帶著歡欣的笑容離開。整體而言,技巧雖有不足之處,但勝在演技也算稱得上是出色的,而氣氛亦不俗,確是一個合家歡的聖誕禮物。 

2011年12月29日 星期四

城市封神 The Legend and the Hero



I rushed to the show literally right after my exam, by the time I got to the theatre, I was about ten minutes late. As you may have expected, I did not do much preparative research on this work prior to the performance. I was absolutely taking a risk of ‘wasting the ticket’, with genuinely nothing in my mind, no prejudgement, no assumption, no nothing, pure sit-back-and-relax. With this state of mind, I should be thankful that this work was pretty accessible, embracing the profound theory in an explicit and somewhat entertaining choreographic device. Surprisingly, few fragments are still fresh like live today, 18 days after the show. 
In fact, CCDC have spent appreciable effort on promotion of this work among secondary schools and universities, supposing they are targeting on the audience with little theatre experience, or primary audience in my word. As far as I have observed, for the works aimed for primary audience, they normally share the following typical characteristics, props oriented, colorful costumes, along with some mainstream type music.  
The part I particularly want to highlight here is the idea of ‘fake arm’, that was incredibly fascinating, intelligent and inspiring. In that session, every dancer was dressed in suit with helmet covering up the face, performing repetitive steps echoed by the robotic electronic sounds. The sense of lost individualism and routine-like suffocation was instantly visualized. Most interestingly, the real arm in suit worked surprisingly well with the fake arm, while the real arm without cover danced like the fake one. It took me a while to figure out which is which. As in the reality, fake or real, we just can’t tell. Intrinsically, the hint of greed, or aspiration from deep inside I should say, was stirringly strong. Free from any restriction, it went wilder and wilder looking like it was going to be detached any second, the real soul was going to be unleashed any minute. I was deeply impressed by the free arm then, I am now more attracted to the posture of the fake arm. When paying more attention, they are all different on each dancer, inducing the slight and only personality to them. The gesture held like it is ready to give a handshake anytime, the most common way to express friendliness, or agreement nowadays. That was fairly reflective and thought-stimulating gesture indeed. Every time when we shake someone’s hand, does that really infer our ‘friendship’, or it’s just an ‘easier’ way to start or end a conversation? In showbiz world, whenever there is a fell-out rumor going on between two artists, they always stand out and shake hands to crack the so-called myth. However, who knows? We should redefine the meaning of handshake in social life. The scene was seriously rooted in my mind, it still constantly loops in my head today. 
Act III - Nine Songs, has been the most enjoyable act in the whole production, with laughters arousing in the hall. Dancers came out wearing a cube with Political figures’ faces on four sides, I can still remember that crystal clear now. It’s not just because the way they moved with that cube was amusing, but the way of how various dance genre were utilized to outline one’s characteristic was absorbing, like conservative ones taking classical ballet steps (Dance of the Lord and the Lady of the Xiang), Obama and Hillary performing the stereotyped American broadway steps (Dance of the Master of Fate and his subordinate). Actually, the relationship between Obama and Hillary was well portrayed in this choreography, dancing in union depicts their superficial peaceful partnership, whereas Obama holding Hillary back when she was trying to go beyond, the hostile kind of relationship was subtly hinted. The best sarcasm must be down to the Dance of the Mountain Ghosts, Neanderthal like steps and clumsy moves were perfect and manifest to illustrate how uncivilized of Laden, Saddam and Gaddafi are. The role of Ai Weiwei there was pretty obvious to be the contemporary version of Qu Yuan. From my point of view, his existence may not be intended to change something, but at least he froze up the scene and let us digest the current picture. This act is, to some extent, cheesy but in an intriguing way. 
Act IV - Questions to the Heaven, is certainly an eye-catching act, the props became the actual dancers. They represent different routine works we face everyday, exaggerated size made those look like endless mission. It sounds quite provocative, right? To be fair, I personally think this scene has ruined the entire work, to some experienced audience I suppose. Too abstract or too explicit of an art work is somehow a fatal wound. In this case, the latter one. Plus, the sense of getting lost or tired from routine work is no longer a ‘new’ idea on stage art, a more innovative approach shall be employed instead. Starting from the beginning, I found this work rather predictable and conservative in terms of storyline and choreographic device, but there were some interesting elements kept me staying. However, this scene, unfortunately, turned out to be a disaster. When the first dancer came up, I sat there and thought: I knew this. Apparently, nothing appeared out of my expectation all the way through, especially for the very last scene of Dominic transcending from crawling to walking with faith, that was the most boring scene ever. No expectation, no surprise, just pure disappointment. 
I would take this production as an installation art exhibition, which seems to be more appropriate. I, indeed, love the costumes and the props incorporated, but there shall be more innovative chemistry between dancers and counterparts. However, having said that, it has been, to a great extent, a considerably successful ‘bridging’ work for audience with little theatre experience.
In general, the approach may not be the best, but the message it conveyed is certainly deep influencing. This work has explored diverse aspects we are familiar with, as if reminding where our Qu Yuan is, or how we should locate Qu Yuan in us. Different scene may have different meaning to different people. As Willy said, everyone possesses his own part of QuYuan. To me, Qu Yuan is always with my social life.