2012年10月30日 星期二

Why do we care what job we hold?



During our discussion, the whole atmosphere went dull and blue at the instant when the fear of hunting a job came on the scene. Shaky job market was not what pulled our faces long, but rather what we exactly want and where we could fit in. Yes, we do care what we are working for.



Why do we bother what kind of job we hold? As the civilization goes on, a remarkably growing awareness of selecting a right job drifts in. Message behind this interesting change is that people nowadays appreciate ‘job’ in a more sophisticated sense. Dating back to old days, people were, to a great extent, merely working for the sake of making a living. Choices of occupation were not complicated then, yet, they did not pay too much attention to what they do either. As long as they could survive with that, any kind would do them favor. In contrast, people in the modern days do hold preferences in seeking a job. The implication is they are expecting something beyond simply fulfilling basic needs - the pursuit of other desires, qualities of je ne sais quoi. As modern human beings, we anticipate intrinsic comforts, namely pleasure, from ‘job’, rather than viewing it as a tool for soothing fleshy needs only. 

So what is work?
Generally speaking, paid jobs are definitely considered as ‘works’, in which you put energy and effort in. Alike idea as Physics, the concept of work is interpreted as the displacement you make with the amount of energy input. Similarly, energy input in jobs will then become contribution, switching from mechanical energy, or whatever form of energy, to objective property, which is commonly seen as money. Regardless the substantiality of money, yet we know our ‘done work’ will continue its life in a new form. This golden rule, very much applied to all, is conceptualized as the idea of contracts in Economics. According to businessdictionary.com, it has a clear definition on ‘work’ in this regard - the entire scope of a project encompassing all people, equipment, material, and other goods and services required to fulfill the contractor’s obligations under a contract. 

In other words, work is basically an established agreement made among two or more parties oriented goods and services exchange. Recalling the birth of currency, the start of quantifying one’s effort in a physical means, we should appreciate this is an ancient notion been deeply rooted from the start of human history.

However, what about those unpaid yet productive activities, such as volunteer work and housework? Under the concept of contract, it seems like they do not get any concrete reward at the end. Isn’t it just a one-sided devotion, a blunt end contract? Standing from employer’s point of view, be more liberal with the meaning of contract, employment is about using money in exchange for ‘work’, which can be something intangible. Seeing this way, employers do receive emotional comfort. Applying to volunteers, abstract satisfaction is what they get in the end, at the expense of their effort and time. With no argue, as a human being, you must feel something when you time is occupied. Volunteers devote and pleasure is the reward. Same as housewives, satisfaction from settling things with their own hands is their ‘wage’. Same with us, students, feeling a big relief upon submission by deadlines is arguably a contenting salary. People use the word ‘work’ for any activity involving energy and time expenditure. No matter voluntarily or involuntarily, people do get something in return, either tangible or intangible or both. Our whole life is work and, work is just a way of living. 


Why do we bother to ‘work’ anyway? 
Or the question should be: why do we ‘need’ reward from work? The most obvious reason is that we need to fulfill our basic needs simply for survival. Yes, we do need money for bread. The end of the day, with limited time and resources, all tasks cannot be simply managed by oneself. Surely it is possible to sew, grow, build and transport your own, but why don’t you do that? Because we should appreciate different people are gifted in different ways. This is why people need interaction. We are cooperating, still under the idea of contract, for better quality of life. Don’t forget, humankind are born with complex functions and thoughts. Solely fulfilling basic needs, even to its most luxurious extent, is not sufficient for us to feel satisfied. Our souls need to be fed with spiritual bread too. This may better justify the fear of hunting a right job, in which is utterly driven by our intrinsic eager to pursue abstract satisfaction. Working is about living and living is about surviving with well-fed souls. 

Bearing this substantiality of work in mind, switch to our trivial reality, treating your job more than a money-making tool could potentially bring your surprises in your career path apart from making sense to your own. 

‘The person who will make the greatest contribution to a company is the mature person - and you cannot have maturity if you have no life or interest outside the job.

This quote, which I agree on very much, reveals the subtle link between maturity and work. In a logical sense, people who make great and impressive contribution to the company are more likely to have a brighter career path. This would be an uplifting motivation for us to engage in our occupation and build intimacy with our ultimate aspiration, in parallel with our personal life attitude. 

Another appreciative point the author made here is the importance of keeping an interest or life outside job, which is echoing to my belief, namely the importance of feeding your spirits. The author also points out the need to nourish our souls from something we enjoy doing. After all, eating physical bread alone could merely keep us surviving. Maturity is more than about growing old. The key is wisdom, which has no direct correlation with age. To be exact, the word wisdom is not superficially about intelligence, but also the ability to manage one’s emotion. In that sense, maturity is about sophistication in managing both technical and psychological issues.

In my own interpretation, the underlying meaning of that statement is the essence of developing as a whole before daring to talk about maturity. What’s more, do not mistake quantity alone can compose ‘great’ contribution, quality shall not be forgotten here. If one is mentally starved, such creature is no better than a programmed robotic flesh handling manageable tasks. No matter how well the duties are managed, such contribution, even at its best of the best, is very much restricted in quantitative respect. Missing is the organic chemistry from the ‘mature’ mind, the mental library created from time to time through daily experiences and exposures. Such abstract treasures can no way be quantified but rather qualified. Organic wittiness, as a result of maturity, would be the essence in making qualitative contribution. 

How to make a great contribution is not the scope to be discussed here, but how and where to pursue maturity matter much more. After knowing the value of making qualitative contribution in a company as well as importance of harvesting spiritual nutrients from non-technical interactions (more from enjoyable activities), so why don’t you find a job you could ‘live’ with it at the first place? Why not pick a job that can be blended in as a part of your life and take it as a way of living? 

By now, you should have a better idea why you feel so frustrated in job hunting. It is purely about the ‘calling’, lusting from inside for something is physically and mentally (and financially) beneficial to ourselves, something we feel comfortable and satisfied with our own touch. We should eye on a job that we can engage and build an intimacy with. We should eye on a job that is purposeful in our own sense. If you happen to take a job that you cannot connect yourself with, you are about  to fall into the bottomless pit of being a dead-alive. 

Work is a just a way of living, take everything as a whole
‘Consistent purpose is not enough to make life happy, but it is an almost indispensable condition of a happy life.’ In my own visualization, consistent purpose is about connecting everything to my own backbone, my soul. Picture our life as a fish backbone, the branches of it are vital in supporting other body parts, different specialized parts of the whole. It is the same in us, we only grow as a whole with everything connected to our master mind. However, the so-called development in various aspects of our lives are merely the fleshes. Without genuine sensible connection to our master mind, solid branches to our backbone, such piece of flesh is no better than a tumor which can be potentially harmful to us. 




The implication of having a whole intact backbone with no dispensable part of one’s life is that: every moment of one’s life belongs to oneself and is connected to one’s ultimate intention in life. Most importantly, the feeling of having all the time reasonably personal is pleasant and enjoyable, simply because we can enjoy more control over personal precious moment. Having the power to shape one’s own time, to a considerable degree, composes one’s happiness. As suggested, consistency plays a big, yet, not an absolute role in leading a happy life, though the opposite is may be true. Unhappiness emanates from something unintentionally bumped into one’s life that is not enjoyable to the counterpart. In that case, it is less likely for oneself to commit, let alone establishing intimacy. This is to say it does not match with one’s personality and expectation, not to mention one’s ultimate purpose. If that activity is unfortunate enough to be your job, which takes up two third of one’s time, then happiness will be fairly distant from that being. 

All in all, hunting the right job, in which you could possibly bond yourself to, is a fundamental staircase to happiness. To step up the ladder of happiness, you should work with your job, as well as other miscellaneous things in your life, cohering every single element with your attitude and intention of life. 

_______________________

Flare

2012年10月20日 星期六

可持續發展的「那些年」﹣《打轉教室》(升級版)






鄧樹榮戲劇工作室
地點:香港藝術中心壽臣劇院
觀劇場次:20120907 8pm

罰抄、留堂、課室內搗蛋、追女孩、「整蠱」老師,每一件「那些年」的校園反斗趣事對於大部分觀眾來說甚有共鳴。校園,的確是一個跨年代、跨種族的好題材。而《打轉教室》是一齣無對白的形體劇場, 讓語言突破語言(肢體語言與文字), 衝破溝通障礙,好讓各國朋友品嘗本地劇場。不然,外國朋友便要錯過這場精彩的喜劇﹣ 一齣將會成為本地表演藝術歷史上其中一個具影響力的國際作品。本地, 是因為它浸淫於香港的生活文化;國際,是因為形體是人類的共同語言。

喜劇, 向來都不容易。對於零對白的劇場,更是一個大挑戰!因為隨著時代的變遷,人類的幽默感開始變得「平面化」。幽默感由當初建基於三維世界的真人騷,漸漸萎縮至二維世界的數碼幽默,甚至單純言語上的明嘰暗諷。再者,今天的語言文字所承擔的功能亦愈來愈多,開始變得疲弱乏力,本來已變得平面的幽默感亦容身無所。幽默感的落差,在不同年代的人上更能真實地印證。要刺激現代人那已麻木的喜劇神經,就要透過通俗的肢體語言重新喚醒我們最原始的天性。返樸歸真正是「打轉教室」的劇場魅力。

在沒有對白的劇場裡,演員間的交接更不可怠慢,不然死氣(dead air)就會冒出來。而且,沒有台詞這有力的媒體,演員不單要把平常說話的張力轉移到肢體上,更要再放大十倍,才能把那股劇場力量「發射」到山頂的觀眾去。值得嘉許的是,當晚演員們的交流極為流暢, 節奏緊湊,同時焦點也十分清晰,觀眾不會因坐席太前而未能及時對焦。當然,一浪接一浪的熱舞、技驚四座的動作特技再配合動感十足的音樂,驚喜、笑彈接二連三,讓觀眾頻頻拍手叫好直到謝幕。

整個演出只有五個角色,卻足以構成完整的校園縮影。女老師的角色可謂經典至極,在學生前為所欲為,在「愛人」前心花怒放,無視他人自我發浪,情緒波動不定。雖然此角色有醜化香港「中女」之嫌,但同時真實地反映香港女性在面對多重期許而變得人格分裂的崩潰狀態。東拼西貼下的香港婦女既要擁有自己的事業,同時繼續負起「賢良淑德」這傳統包袱。劇中的老師行為極端,巧妙地呈現出中西文化的衝突下角色困惑的痛苦。是新時代包袱,更是一齣活生生的本土文化悲劇。女老師病態地欺凌學生,說穿了也不過是透過「彰顯」那僅餘的權力來自我慰藉而已。

而劇中三位男學生更是時下男生的真實寫照,鍾愛搖滾音樂、裝酷、頹廢、書呆子、幼稚、「泡女」及最具本地色彩的崇日行為等。這些看似普通,卻毫無保留地描繪了本地高中生的特質。當然, 在大眾的集體回憶裡,總會有一位迷倒眾男生的清純女生。她的角色就是鄰家女孩般:含羞答答、溫柔體貼,是父權思想下理想女朋友的經典形象。同時她亦要適當地表現其弱質的一面,好讓男生有機會保護這朵惹人憐愛的小花,滿足那英雄主義式的虛榮心。故事情節雖然通俗,或俗語說﹣「老套」,但不論在角色塑造上,抑或情節鋪排上都是明顯經過精心雕琢的,稱得上細膩無瑕。這四個學生的互動間微妙地流露出香港的核心意識形態﹣開放中帶保守。整段留堂時光,男生都是以搏取女生歡心為終極目標,並意無意透露佔有女生身體的慾望。但行為上亦反映他們內心受著傳統思想影響,大致上仍以男女授授不親為原則。即使有身體接觸,也不過是一般朋友式的示好。

這齣劇看似簡單,但結構緊密,境界非凡。要成功,先要能好好掌握角色的個性並張其極化。 劇中每一個角色可謂為演員度身訂造, 從自己的個性、長處出發。誇張中帶自然,散發出演員自身的劇場光芒,令舞台靈活有機。此外,要帶有本地色彩,更需能確切地掌握自身的身份。而香港人的身份早已經在港英政府結束時形成的文化斷層中迷失,模糊得無法確定。經過年月的洗禮、沉澱,身份開始在零碎的集體回憶中成形,當中以中學「那些年」的回憶最能呼喚大眾的認同。再者,香港的校規是獨特的,既保留了英式對校服、操守嚴謹的規定,亦滲透了中國那含蓄的氣息。台上這個小小的教室裡,無形間為受港英教育風氣喧染的「八、九十後」提供了身份探索的切入點。

導演鄧樹榮先生希望把這劇延續,甚至成為土生土長的長壽劇場。筆者亦認為這個雅俗共賞而高藝術性的本土喜劇是具深度的非物質文化產物,值得永恆的舞台生命。「升級版」也暗示了它是個會成長的劇場,令人期待下一次的演出。既然不是古典故事,那麼課室中的趣事會隨著年代變遷而更新嗎? 劇場上會因應新班子變動而綻放新的化學作用嗎?筆者有個有趣的想法,未來發展也許可以跟據本地不同地區的學校風氣再細分主題,編織一個更完整的本土校園回憶,擴展這長壽劇的使命。